In JavaScript, the natural primitive for "a sequence of things that arrive over time" is already in the language: the async iterable. You consume it with for await...of. You stop consuming by stopping iteration.
The most frustrating experience. Their automated “review” system confirmed the phishing classification after my first request. The submission form uses unintuitive categories that took multiple attempts. Eventually, I bypassed the form entirely and replied directly to one of their automated emails.
，更多细节参见heLLoword翻译官方下载
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
Publication date: 10 March 2026